A Question Of Euthanasia And Human Right For Life And Death

 

There is mentioned a long range of rights in Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which every man should have. One of them is the right to live. However, such circumstances can occur in life, in which the man suffers very much and rather chooses death instead of further suffering. Has the man the right to die in this case? Sad to say, he has not!

As we know, every man hides a soul in himself, which is immortal and will again embody into a child's body after his death. That is why there is no need of being afraid of death.

It is cruel and inhuman to lengthen the suffering of incurably ill people by ever-lasting putting off their death, and this even in the case, where these people themselves do not want to live any further and would wish to die instead of live. But criminal organization called “world health service” tries - with all its might - to lengthen the suffering of such people for as the longest time as possible. It does not choose a merciful death, but rather slow and many years lasting torture, which is in the end much longer, than slow tortures in the Middle Ages usually have been.

I say well: “The biggest criminals are those who let an intensely suffering and asking for death creature live instead of killing it.”

What euthanasia in animals concerns, we can compare it to possible euthanasia in people.

If for example a dog falls incurably ill, it's owner has a right to stop its suffering through a merciful death. Putting to sleep a suffering animal is an ordinary affair. Whereas in this respect we are merciful toward animals, to one another we are most cruel and we let our neighbors suffer and we lengthen their suffering even in the case, when there is no way to help them.

Humanity and medical ethics are always mentioned. But any lengthening of the patient's pain - moreover against his will - is in direct contradiction with this humanity and medical ethics.

If life of a suffering man was ended through a merciful death, his soul would soon be born again and probably entered the body of some healthy child. So in this way - through euthanasia - a man (or to say it more exactly his soul) would gain a new body and a new life. What is the point in the lengthening of the death of him who suffers so much, that he himself wants to die? Why deny him his right to the new and healthy body? I tell you, this is the biggest crime!

From the above-mentioned it is absolutely clear, that where all the affordable means and remedies failed, there remains nothing else but the last remedy yet perfect - Death.